Join collection
Hello, welcome to our official webs≥ π↔ite!
互聯網保險需要(yào)三思而後行(xíng)
2019-01-12

  2018年(nián)可(kě)能(néng)成為(wèi)我國(guó)互聯網‍®♦±保險發展的(de)一(yī)個(gè)“關口”,或是(shì)一(yī)個(gè)“轉折”,✘₩φ因此,“今非昔比”既是(shì)狀态,更應是(shì)心态,在這γ₹(zhè)個(gè)曆史背景下(xià),互聯網保險*需¥★要(yào)的(de)是(shì)“三思而後行(xíng)”,不(bù)僅是(shì)回顧曆史的★↕←(de)反思與總結,更是(shì)面向未來(lái)的(de)清晰與堅βε€→定。


  我國(guó)互聯網保險經過了(le)十幾年(nián)的(de)發展,取得(de)的(de)π‌↕成績可(kě)謂是(shì)有(yǒu)目共睹,但(dàn)與此同♠®時(shí)也(yě)面臨著(zhe)許多(duō)突出問(wèn)題和(hé)深≤★>層次矛盾,尤其是(shì)2016年(nián)以來(lπ≈γπái),互聯網保險的(de)發展出現(xiàn)了(le)較大(Ω£dà)的(de)“跌宕起伏”。于是(shì),有(yǒu)人(rén)困惑,也(yě)有(↕←yǒu)人(rén)疑惑,更有(yǒu)人(rén)批評®​​£,甚至是(shì)指責。但(dàn)殊不(bù)知(zhī),任何一(yī)個(gè)新生(€±αφshēng)事(shì)物(wù)的(de)成長(cháng)都(dōu)會(huì)面臨“跌λ​♦宕起伏”,甚至是(shì)“磕磕碰碰”,這(zhè)既是(sh∑ λ☆ì)成長(cháng)的(de)代價,更是(shì)發展σ→✘的(de)必然。

  2018年(nián)可(kě)能(néng)成為(wèi)我↔εα國(guó)互聯網保險發展的(de)一(yī)個(gè)“關口”,或是(shì←‌ )一(yī)個(gè)“轉折”,因此,“今非昔比”既是(shì)狀态,更‍→應是(shì)心态。在這(zhè)個(gè)曆史背景下(xià★✘♦‌),互聯網保險*需要(yào)的(de)是(shì)“三思而後行(xíng÷ ®)”,不(bù)僅是(shì)回顧曆史的(de)反思與總結,λσ↔更是(shì)面向未來(lái)的(de)清晰與堅定。

  回顧曆史,我國(guó)互聯網保險在推動保險業(yè)改革、創新與發展過程中發揮±✘♦<了(le)重要(yào)和(hé)獨特的(dδ₹e)作(zuò)用(yòng),可(kě)以用(yòng)三句話(huà)概括§ ₩♠,一(yī)是(shì)異軍突起,作(zuò)用(≠α♠yòng)顯著。作(zuò)為(wèi)一(yī)種新生(shēng)力量,♥"♥互聯網保險不(bù)僅是(shì)提高(gāo)了(le)效率,更€•→創造了(le)可(kě)能(néng),解決了(le)許多(duō)發展、改革和(héππ )服務中的(de)“瓶頸”和(hé)“*後一(yī)公裡(lǐ)”問(wèn)題,推動了(₹εσ↓le)行(xíng)業(yè)的(de)創新與進步,可♠↕€&(kě)謂是(shì)作(zuò)用(yòng)顯著,功不(bù)可(kě)沒。二$ €是(shì)各美(měi)其美(měi),相(xiàng)得(de)益彰。在互聯網保險的(de)發™₹÷展過程中,不(bù)僅有(yǒu)傳統的(de)保險企業(yè),也(yě)有(yǒu)∏₽互聯網保險企業(yè)。不(bù)僅有(yǒu)保險企業(yè),也(yě)有(yǒu)互聯δ✘'網保險科(kē)技(jì)企業(yè),還(hái)有(y '×ǒu)互聯網科(kē)創企業(yè)。他(tā)✔‍₹↔們相(xiàng)互協同,交相(xiàn↓±♠g)輝映,取長(cháng)補短(duǎn),共同創新。三是(shì)科(kē)技(jì)賦能₹×↓$(néng),重塑保險。互聯網保險*大(dà)貢獻在于科(kē)技(jì)賦能(₩★₹ néng),通(tōng)過對(duì)時(shí)空(kōng↓¶"←)的(de)再認識與利用(yòng),變不(bù)可(kě)能(néng)為(wèi)現(xiàn≈€✔)實,不(bù)僅是(shì)結構性降低(d© γī)了(le)運營成本,更解決了(le)經營過程中的(de)風(fēng)險、信用±£§(yòng)和(hé)效率等難題,實現(xiàn)了(le)商業(yγ£±±è)模式的(de)叠代,同時(shí),₩↕≥λ實現(xiàn)了(le)碎片化(huà)和(hé)場(chǎng)景≤γ≤化(huà)的(de)創新。

  這(zhè)是(shì)一(yī)個(gè)快(kuài)速變化(huà)的(deφ±∏)時(shí)代,快(kuài)的(de)讓人(rén)有(yǒu)點“猝不(bù)及防”,就(jφ∞iù)來(lái)不(bù)及“思”,更沒有©♥÷<(yǒu)時(shí)間(jiān)“想”λ★π→。沒有(yǒu)了(le)思想,缺乏了(le)理(Ω©↓¥lǐ)論,淡漠了(le)文(wén)化(huà),就(j→αiù)難免沖動、盲目、浮躁,乃至“任性”×↓。都(dōu)說(shuō)“這(zhè)個(gè)世界**不(bù)變的(de)>₩就(jiù)是(shì)變化(huà)”,于是(shì),人(rén)們就(jiù)忙←✔于“變化(huà)”,殚精竭慮,身(shēn)心俱疲,蓦然回首,卻迷茫于“我是(shì)誰”。$α'δ但(dàn)在中國(guó)古人(rén)看(kàn)來(lái),βφβ世界是(shì)變的(de),世界更是(shì)不(bù)變↔♦¥的(de)。人(rén),隻有(yǒu)把握好(hǎo)不(bù)變的(de),才能(néng&δ♠)夠把握未來(lái)。中國(guó)人(rén)稱這(zhè✘≤π€)種“不(bù)變”為(wèi)“常”,為(wèi)“道(dào)”。 有(yǒu₩§γ<)的(de)時(shí)候,人(rén)們覺得(de)“道>λ(dào)”是(shì)一(yī)個(gè)玄乎其玄的(de)東(dōng)西(xī),一(yī≥←)個(gè)遠(yuǎn)在天邊的(de)東•≠©>(dōng)西(xī)。殊不(bù)知(↕÷zhī),當你(nǐ)覺悟了(le),“道(dΩ☆ào)”就(jiù)在你(nǐ)的(de)眼前身(shēn)邊。把握好₽•​±(hǎo)“道(dào)”是(shì)為(wèi)人(rén)處世的(de)根本和(€α♥hé)基礎,因為(wèi),古人(rén)說(shuō):得←♣(de)道(dào)者,得(de)天下(xià)。

  互聯網保險面臨自(zì)我叠代的(de)挑戰,這(zhè)種挑戰,不(bù)單是(shì)技(≠§✔jì)術(shù),也(yě)不(bù)僅是(shì)商業(yè₽₽ε‌),而是(shì)思想、理(lǐ)論、理(lǐ)念與文(wén)♠&化(huà)。因為(wèi),離(lí)開(kāi)理(lǐ)論的(de)實踐,注₹∞定是(shì)盲目的(de)實踐。因為(wèi)δ&®,一(yī)支沒有(yǒu)文(wén)化(huà)的(de)軍隊,注定是(shì)要(y↓≠≈ào)打敗戰的(de)。互聯網保險是(shì)要(yào)探索一(yī)條“前無古人±£™≠(rén)”的(de)路(lù),沒有(yǒu)“前車(chē)之鑒”,靠什(shénα"®)麽指引方向,靠理(lǐ)論,靠文(wén)化ε≈(huà)。要(yào)做(zuò)到(dào)÷₹↕這(zhè)一(yī)點,就(jiù)需要(yào)不(☆"bù)斷地(dì)反思,正如(rú)孔子(zǐ)在聽(tīng)說(shuō)季文(w ¥én)子(zǐ)每每做(zuò)事(shì)均“三思而後行(x÷δíng)”時(shí)說(shuō):再,斯可(kě)矣↔&✔>,講的(de)是(shì)借鑒以往的(de §÷)重要(yào)。無論是(shì)“思”,還(hái)是(<¥♦shì)“再”,其本質均是(shì)“省”,因此,古人(rén)說(s≈♠‍λhuō):吾日(rì)三省吾身(shēn)。在互聯網保σ£∏險的(de)發展過程中,尤其需要(yào)不(bù)斷地(dì)回顧、反思和(hé)檢討(tǎ₽•o),需要(yào)不(bù)斷的(de)“三思”和(hé)“¥Ω®三省”,繼而問(wèn)道(dào)于心,明‍‌₩(míng)心見(jiàn)性,且行(xíng)且珍惜。

  “三思”的(de)第一(yī)“思”是(shì)回答(dá)“α→為(wèi)什(shén)麽”,即為(wèi)什(shén)麽做(zuò)互Ω φ₽聯網保險。

  “為(wèi)什(shén)麽”的(de)背後是(shì)“為(w≠↔'èi)了(le)誰”,即發展互聯網保險的(de)宗÷™•旨問(wèn)題。這(zhè)個(gè)問(wèn)題看(kàn)似簡單,但(dàn)卻'β'•經不(bù)起“推敲”。今天,從(cóng)事(shì>↕ ≥)互聯網保險的(de)人(rén)可(kě)謂是(shì)來®✘(lái)自(zì)“五湖(hú)四海(hǎi)”,σ'>∏但(dàn)并非都(dōu)是(shì)為(wèi)了(le)一(yī)個(gè)“共'✔₹同的(de)目标”走到(dào)一(yī)起。相(xiàng)信大‍ε(dà)多(duō)數(shù)人(rén)肯定是(shì)為(wèi)了(le)理(lδ↑ǐ)想而來(lái),但(dàn)也(yě)不(✘∞∏bù)乏個(gè)别“心懷叵測”的(de)投機(jī)者,想的(de)是(sλβhì)“趕時(shí)髦”、“炒概念”,然後“套現(xiàn)走人(rén)§§∞ ”。人(rén)們為(wèi)什(shén)麽而來(lái),即為(wèi)什(shén)麽做(z↓"§ uò)互聯網保險,或者是(shì)為(wèi)了(↑ λle)誰做(zuò)互聯網保險,似乎已成為(wèi)了(le)所有(yǒu)問(wèn)δ☆£​題的(de)“結”。提出這(zhè)個(gè)問(wèn)題,是(shì)♣​$ 因為(wèi)有(yǒu)些(xiē)人(rén)也βλ"(yě)許太忙了(le),并沒有(yǒu)認真“思”過這(zhè)個(gè)問(wèn)題,稀裡γ (lǐ)糊塗地(dì)就(jiù)來(lái)做(zuò)互聯網保險,就(jiù)難免做(z‌♦• uò)的(de)稀裡(lǐ)糊塗。當然,或許有(yǒu)些(xiē)人(ré♥®​n)也(yě)想過,卻“難以啓齒”,或“不(bù)可(kě)π×>λ告人(rén)”。

  中國(guó)古人(rén)推崇:修身(shēn)齊家(jiā)治國(guó)×∏☆平天下(xià)。縱觀互聯網保險的(de)發展過程,特别是(shì)出現(xià±←₽n)的(de)亂象和(hé)存在的(de)問(wèn)題,症結就(∑∞jiù)出在“修身(shēn)”。而“修身(shēn)”的(de)關★>×鍵是(shì)回答(dá):為(wèi)什(shén)麽。這(zhè)既是(shì)問(wèn"♥)題所在,也(yě)是(shì)成功的(de)關鍵。“為¶"Ω±(wèi)什(shén)麽”的(de)問(wèn)題回答(dá)好(hǎo)了δ​(le),就(jiù)不(bù)容易出問(wèn)題,就(jiù)能(néng)夠•ε‌成功。所以,每一(yī)個(gè)做(zuò)互聯網保險的(de)人(rén),首先要(yào₽γ←)解決好(hǎo)“修身(shēn)”與“齊家(jφ≥α✔iā)(公司)”的(de)問(wèn)題,即“為(w₩∏✔>èi)什(shén)麽”和(hé)“為(wèi)了(le)誰”的(de)問(w•←δèn)題,因為(wèi),這(zhè)是(shì)你(nǐ)的(de)出發,♦♠™↕你(nǐ)的(de)初心,是(shì)你(nǐ)“行(xíng)走于江湖(hú)”的(de•‌π←)依靠與寄托。如(rú)果根本和(hé)基礎問(≈××λwèn)題解決不(bù)好(hǎo),那(nà)麽,離(l→¥í)成功就(jiù)可(kě)能(néng)“相(xiàng)去(qù)甚遠(yuǎn)”,更别談δ✘什(shén)麽“治國(guó)”與“平天下(x↓β←ià)”。

  作(zuò)為(wèi)一(yī)種互聯網平台,流量肯定是(shì)“意義非凡<↕”,因為(wèi),得(de)流量者,得(de)天下(xià)。作(zuò)為(wè"‍♥i)一(yī)家(jiā)公司,故事(shì)很(hěn)重要(yào),投資者∑₽‌買的(de)就(jiù)是(shì)“故事(shì)”£∏ λ。作(zuò)為(wèi)一(yī)個(gè)創業(yè)團隊,資本更是(shì)重要(y™​γào),沒有(yǒu)了(le)資本青睐,再好(hǎo)的(de)理(lǐ)想抱負,也 ≥(yě)隻能(néng)是(shì)想想而已。雖然流量、故事(shì×α)和(hé)資本都(dōu)重要(yào),而且很(♦λπαhěn)重要(yào),但(dàn)它們肯定不(bù)是(shì)互聯網保險的(de)>•♠π根本和(hé)全部。互聯網保險*重要(yào)的(de)是(sh÷↑₩>ì)發揮自(zì)身(shēn)的(de)特πγ 點和(hé)優勢,提**率,創造可(kě♠♥÷σ)能(néng),而更重要(yào)的(de)是(shì)為(wèi)客戶創造價值,≠©Ω福祉行(xíng)業(yè)和(hé)社會(huì)​♥∞。

  這(zhè)些(xiē)年(nián),互聯網保險,特别是(π‍shì)互聯網車(chē)險,“井噴式”發展是(s€♦βhì)它,“塌陷式”下(xià)滑也(yě)是(shì)它,讓外(wài)±™人(rén)看(kàn)的(de)是(shì)“一(yī)頭霧水(shuǐ)”,局中人(rén)÷↓♥<則“心知(zhī)肚明(míng)”。從(cóng)表面上(shàng)看(kàn),都($✘‌↔dōu)是(shì)“15%”惹的(de)禍,但(dàn)從(có∞∑'₹ng)根本上(shàng)講,仍是(shì)跳(tiào)不(bù•®γ)出“掩耳盜鈴”和(hé)“自(zì)欺欺人(rén)”的(de)局限,忘記了(le)心存敬畏是σ$→♥(shì)做(zuò)人(rén)做(zuò)事(shì)的(de)根本道(dào)→'理(lǐ)。

  明(míng)白(bái)大(dà)道(dàδγ‍♠o)理(lǐ)并不(bù)難,難的(de)是(shì)知(zhī)行(xíng)©•合一(yī),難的(de)是(shì)先後順序。傳統文(wén)化(hββεuà)中有(yǒu)“己欲立而立人(rén),己欲達而達人(ré ↕♣n)”的(de)智慧,講的(de)是(shì)先人(rén)後己,成人(rén)達己。無論是(s¶≤↕§hì)保險,還(hái)是(shì)互聯網保險,都(dōu)面臨這(zhè)個(gε∑è)問(wèn)題,即是(shì)先成人(rén),還(hái)是(shì)先∏®∑←達己。許多(duō)時(shí)候,人(rén)們更多(duō)地(dì)是(shì)想©≈λ“達己”,結果往往是(shì)事(shì)∞±與願違,欲速不(bù)達。佛家(jiā)講:渡人(rén)渡←Ω己。把别人(rén)渡到(dào)了(le)彼岸,蓦然回首,你(nǐ)已&♠然在彼岸。互聯網保險的(de)發展*需要(yà$λ o)的(de)就(jiù)是(shì)這( ×zhè)種智慧,而*缺的(de)也(yě)是(shì)這(zh≤φ<è)種智慧。

  “三思”的(de)第二“思”是(shì)回答→$(dá)“是(shì)什(shén)麽”,即互¶★聯網保險到(dào)底是(shì)什(shén)麽。

  古人(rén)說(shuō):凡事(shì)預則立,不(bù)預則廢。這¥"(zhè)句話(huà)的(de)後面還(há ≠↓i)有(yǒu)一(yī)段:言前定則不(bù)跲,事(shì)前定則不(bù)困,α​π行(xíng)前定則不(bù)疚,道(dào)前定則不(bù)窮。講的(d♥​e)是(shì)說(shuō)話(huà)辦事(shì),尤≠>∏其是(shì)辦大(dà)事(shì)之前,務必先把一(y×↕★ī)些(xiē)根本性的(de)問(wèn)題想清楚,弄明(míng)白(bái)。就γ♣≈≠(jiù)互聯網保險而言,也(yě)面臨這(zhè↕')個(gè)問(wèn)題,互聯網保險到(dà§>o)底是(shì)什(shén)麽,是(shì)渠道(dào),是(shì)營銷手段,還(h∞★ái)是(shì)商業(yè)模式。這(zhè)些(xiē)問(wèn)題如(rú)果還(h"<§ái)沒有(yǒu)想清楚,弄明(míng)白(bái),在做(zuò)的(de)過程中就(ji ¥∑≈ù)可(kě)能(néng)面臨困惑、糾結↓α€,乃至迷茫。

  随著(zhe)互聯網保險公司的(de)出現(xiàn),作(zuò)為(wèi)≤ 一(yī)種商業(yè)模式,似乎已是(shì)不(bù)言而喻了(le)。但(dàn₽←✘)互聯網保險公司的(de)出現(xiàn)并不≤×(bù)等于互聯網保險商業(yè)模式的(de)成δ∑∑熟,它隻是(shì)為(wèi)探索互聯網保險商業(yè)γδλ§模式提供了(le)一(yī)種“機(jī)緣”,因此,→↑什(shén)麽是(shì)互聯網保險,什(shén)麽是(shì)互聯網保險÷£σ的(de)基礎理(lǐ)論、基本原理(lǐ),互聯網保險發©>展的(de)基本邏輯是(shì)什(shén)麽,互聯網保險的(de)核心能(néδ↑ng)力是(shì)什(shén)麽,它的(de)商業(yè)模σ≥式是(shì)什(shén)麽,諸如(rú)此類,林(lín)林(lín)總總的(₩<‌&de)問(wèn)題仍有(yǒu)待人(ré÷♥♦n)們回答(dá),特别是(shì)通(tōng)過♣→♦實踐去(qù)回答(dá)。古人(rén)說(shuō):君子(zǐ)務本,本立道(d₹↓☆αào)生(shēng)。互聯網保險也(yě)一₹α(yī)樣,上(shàng)述問(wèn)題均屬于互聯網保險的(de)根本性問(wèn)題∑ $,如(rú)果這(zhè)些(xiē)問(wèn)題回答(dá)不(→≤​ bù)好(hǎo),就(jiù)可(kě)能(néng)找不(bù)到(dà≈₹♥o)自(zì)己的(de)“初心”,就(jiù)容易“本末倒™✘↕置”,“忘乎所以”,甚至是(shì)“舍本逐末”,“誤把他(tā)鄉(xiāng)做εΩ÷(zuò)故鄉(xiāng)”,就(jiù)不(bù)可(kě)能(néng)做(zuò)好→<(hǎo)互聯網保險。

  “三思”的(de)第三“思”是(shì)回答(dá)“做∏§↓(zuò)什(shén)麽”,即互聯網保險做(zuò)什(shén)麽。

  互聯網保險,屬于“前無古人(rén)”的(de)事≈ δ(shì)業(yè),因此,需要(yào)“摸著(zhe)石頭過δ¶←河(hé)”,在戰争中學習(xí)戰争,在不(bù)斷的(de)探索與實踐中回答(dá)互聯♠¥網保險是(shì)什(shén)麽的(de)問(wèn)題。當下(xià)有(yǒu)≈<©♠一(yī)個(gè)觀點經常被濫用(yòng),就(jiù)是(shì)“試錯(cuò)Ω→π”。積極實踐,大(dà)膽探索固然重要(≈✘♦yào),但(dàn)所有(yǒu)的(de)實踐與探索均應當是(shì)理(lǐ)性β¶®的(de),應當在理(lǐ)論的(de)指導下(xià)開(kāi)展的(de)↓♠€,否則就(jiù)是(shì)盲目,甚至是(sh↕Ωì)愚昧。就(jiù)互聯網保險而言,可(kě)以肯定的(de)是(shì):并不(bù)是(sh↔↔♥₽ì)所有(yǒu)的(de)保險産品均适合互聯網>β<經營模式的(de)。互聯網保險也(yě)面臨“有(yǒu)所為(wèi)有(yǒu)所不(✘±γ♠bù)為(wèi)”的(de)問(wèn)題。更重要(yào)的(de)是(shì):互聯¶φ≥∞網保險有(yǒu)其獨特的(de)優勢,但(dàn)這(zhè)些(xiē)優勢也(y©‌ě)需要(yào)“善加利用(yòng)”。現(xiàn)在有(yǒu)些(xiē)互聯網επ保險業(yè)務是(shì)建立在保險業(yè)發展過程中存在的(de)“問(wèn)♦↑★€題”基礎上(shàng),比如(rú)“借個(gè)道(dào)”、“開(kāi)張票(≠φ piào)”和(hé)“墊點錢(qián)”,盡管也(yě§ )能(néng)夠實現(xiàn)“商業(yè)模式”,甚至賺得(de)“盆滿缽滿”,但(d  ₩‍àn)肯定不(bù)是(shì)互聯網保險發展的&÷¥(de)“正道(dào)”,還(hái)可(kě)能(néng)“誤了(le)卿卿性命”。因✘®‌此,互聯網保險的(de)發展,需要(yào)回答(dá)的(de)往☆ 往不(bù)是(shì)能(néng)夠做(zuò ≥₽®)什(shén)麽,而是(shì)應該做(zuò)什(shé€↑ n)麽。

  互聯網發展到(dào)了(le)今天,尤其是(shì)在商業(yè)領域的 ∑(de)應用(yòng),發揮的(de)作(zuò)用(yòng),取得(d₹≤↓¶e)的(de)成績是(shì)有(yǒu)目共睹的(de),并形成了(le)獨特的(de)“商業(∞±yè)模式”,但(dàn)其中的(de)許多(duō)做(zuò£∞γ)法,仍有(yǒu)待時(shí)間(ji★"ān)檢驗。但(dàn)就(jiù)互聯網保↔ε‍險而言,則“又(yòu)當别論”,作(zuò)為(wèi)一(yī)種金(jīn)融制(zhì ₹ π)度安排,保險具有(yǒu)很(hěn)強的(de)特↕∞↔殊性,因此,不(bù)能(néng)簡單地(dì)“擁抱”互聯網,可(kě₩∑<σ)以肯定:不(bù)是(shì)所有(yǒu♥αβ<)互聯網的(de)“成功經驗”均适合互聯網保險經營,這(zhè)就(jiù)是(shì•×γ♠)古人(rén)講“南(nán)橘北(běi)♣®枳”的(de)道(dào)理(lǐ)。面對(★♣←duì)互聯網,保險需要(yào)“知(zhī)己知(zhī)彼”,需要(yào)“因地(dì ♥♠σ)制(zhì)宜”,更要(yào)清晰并堅守自(zì)我。*重要(yào)的(de)是(sh§↕ì)不(bù)能(néng)照(zhào)搬照(zhào)抄 ₩,更不(bù)能(néng)盲目跟風(fēng),趕時(shí)髦,要(yào)∏ γ±有(yǒu)所取舍,揚長(cháng)避短(duǎn),為(wèi)£≈我所用(yòng),定義并打造互聯網保險的(de)技(jì)術(sh÷α÷ù)和(hé)商業(yè)模式。

  在互聯網保險的(de)發展過程中,往往容易陷入互聯網行(xíng)業(yè)的(de' •​)“集體(tǐ)亢奮”狀态。“亢奮”不(bù)是(shì)一(yī)件(jiàn)壞事ε ✘γ(shì),做(zuò)事(shì)業(y₩★✔↔è),尤其是(shì)做(zuò)一(yī)番前無古人(≤₹rén)的(de)大(dà)事(shì)業(yè®φ£),熱(rè)情和(hé)激情均是(shì)必不(bù)可(kě)少(shǎo)₩¥•的(de)。但(dàn)保險是(shì)一(yī)種平滑機(jī)制(zhì),✘↔♣不(bù)能(néng)太“跌宕起伏”,₽&更不(bù)能(néng)“心驚肉跳(tiào)”。因此,“淡定”很(hěn)重要(yào≥≥γ)。保險需要(yào)日(rì)積月(y®∑↔uè)累,不(bù)能(néng)太“急功近(jìn)利”,更懂(dǒng)得(de)“§‌₽敬畏時(shí)間(jiān)”。因此,“定力”很(hěn)重要(y஀✘o)。同時(shí),要(yào)記得(de₹Ω):能(néng)夠成就(jiù)大(dà)事(shì)業(yè)的(de)重要(αΩyào)前提是(shì)“不(bù)忘初心”,做(zuò)互聯網保險,*重要(yàΩ×✔$o)的(de)是(shì)不(bù)能(néng)忘記“我是(shì)誰”。互→&₹π聯網保險,“互聯網”是(shì)形容詞,“保險”是(shì)主語,因此,互聯網保險還♠γ∞(hái)是(shì)保險,切莫“數(shù)典忘祖”。

  射悻合同的(de)特征決定了(le)保險具有(yǒu)一(yī)定“÷¶虛”的(de)成分(fēn),而互聯網的(de)“虛”是(shì✘≤★→)不(bù)言而喻的(de),兩個(gè)π↕€δ“虛”相(xiàng)遇,決定了(le)互聯網保險注定要(yàπ¥≥o)面對(duì)一(yī)場(chǎng)虛實觀的(de)挑戰。無論是(shì)保險,×✔≥還(hái)是(shì)商業(yè),信用(yòng)均是(shì)基礎、靈魂和(h™≥‌é)命根子(zǐ)。要(yào)知(zhī)道(dào):虛則不(bù)實,不♣≈(bù)實則不(bù)信,因此,如(rú)何将互聯網保險做(zuò)“實”,無疑∞≥♠是(shì)一(yī)個(gè)難題,但(dàn)又(yòu)是(shì₩<☆)無法回避的(de)。都(dōu)說(shuō)隻要(yào)思想不(bù)滑坡,辦法總是(sh↕≠ì)比困難多(duō),因此,解決思想認€☆識問(wèn)題是(shì)基礎,是(shì)關鍵β₩,清晰、堅定并踐行(xíng)正确的(d✘•e)互聯網保險虛實觀是(shì)重要(yào)路(lù)徑。韓₹€₩非子(zǐ)曾經說(shuō)過:存亡在虛實,不(bù)在衆寡 ↓£φ。這(zhè)句話(huà),對(duì)盲λ ±←目地(dì)沉迷于“流量”的(de)人(rén)們無疑是(shì)一(y¥"<™ī)副清醒劑,更是(shì)給了(le)互聯網保險虛實觀以啓β®βε迪。做(zuò)互聯網保險的(de)人(rén)應明(m​↑εíng)白(bái):做(zuò)實難,做(zuò&α≤∞)實也(yě)不(bù)難,難的(de)是(shì)“誠實心φ↓¥意”。

  互聯網保險的(de)基本屬性決定了(l>‍λe)科(kē)技(jì),尤其是(shì)科(kē)技(jì)創新能∞®¥(néng)力至關重要(yào),因此,加大(dà)投£↔入也(yě)就(jiù)勢在必行(xíng)。但(dàn₽₹)問(wèn)題的(de)關鍵不(bù)是(shì)要(yào)不(bù)要(yào)投入,而是(ש←shì)如(rú)何投入,回答(dá)如(rú)何投★<₩入的(de)前提是(shì)回答(dá) ≠♦為(wèi)什(shén)麽投入。當下(xià)讓人(rén)有(yǒu)點憂心忡α↕≈≠忡的(de)是(shì):不(bù)知(zhī)道(dào)從(cóng)什(shén)麽時©↓Ωα(shí)候開(kāi)始,“燒錢(qián)”成為(wèi)了(le)一(yī)種流行(xínΩ​g),甚至是(shì)時(shí)髦。在老(lǎo)百姓看(kàn)來(lái),錢(qián),是(shì)不(bù)能επ♥λ(néng)拿(ná)來(lái)“燒”的(de),太可(kě)惜了(le),也(yě)✘÷♣≥犯法。錢(qián),是(shì)用(yòng)來(lái)花(huā)λ"的(de),花(huā)錢(qián)過日(rì)子(zǐ)。“燒錢(qián∏×)”,那(nà)是(shì)“燒”給死人(rén)的(de)。咋一(yī)聽(tīng),有('↔¥±yǒu)點“風(fēng)馬牛不(bù)相(xiàng)及”,仔細想想,個(gè)中÷∏¶道(dào)理(lǐ),似乎也(yě)相(xià≠δπ ng)通(tōng)。

  科(kē)技(jì)創新的(de)本質是(shì)提**率,創造價值。風(f✔↑∏±ēng)險投資的(de)本意是(shì)為(wèi)了(le)通(tōng)過一(yī)種制(z®α☆hì)度安排,有(yǒu)效分(fēn)散風(fēng)險,激勵創新探索,為(wèi)社會(hΩ↔δ¶uì)創造價值。但(dàn)任何事(shì)情均有(yǒu)個(gè)度®×∞,“度”的(de)這(zhè)邊是(shì₹$)鼓勵探索,“度”的(de)那(nà)邊是(shì)縱容γ'₹♥盲目,甚至“居心叵測”。因此,要(yào)高(gāo)度關注社會(huì)層面的(de)科$↔∑‍(kē)技(jì)創新總績效問(wèn)題,科(kē)學和βε$(hé)理(lǐ)性應當成為(wèi)社會∞✘$(huì)創新文(wén)化(huà)的(de)重要(yào)內(nèi)涵。

  創新和(hé)創業(yè)都(dōu)不(bù)®÷容易。正是(shì)不(bù)易,更要(yào)∏ ‍§心存敬畏,不(bù)能(néng)任性。不(b>$♠'ù)是(shì)有(yǒu)句話(huà)說(shuō):出來(lái)混,都(dōu)是(shì♦ ✘)要(yào)還(hái)的(de)。創業(yè)者₩↕ ♦更要(yào)有(yǒu)一(yī)份清醒,有(yǒu)的(de)時(shí)候₽♥£α,你(nǐ)燒的(de)不(bù)僅是(shì)投資者的(de)錢(qián),還(εβhái)有(yǒu)自(zì)己的(de)大(dà)好π♦(hǎo)時(shí)光(guāng)和≈∏(hé)機(jī)會(huì)。

  流量是(shì)互聯網經濟的(de)起點,也(yě)↔≠☆ε是(shì)關鍵,所以有(yǒu)了(le)那(nà)句話(huà±&​β):流量為(wèi)王。因此,所有(yǒu)的(de)競争均圍繞引流展開(kāi),與✘✘₽✔此同時(shí),也(yě)孕育了(le)獨特的(™‌¶¶de)商業(yè)模式。從(cóng)互聯網保險發展的(de₹  Ω)情況看(kàn),引流成本,或業(yè)務獲取成πγ♠本畸高(gāo)是(shì)一(yī)個(gè)不(b£≠ù)争的(de)現(xiàn)實,又(yòu)是(sφ$¶≈hì)一(yī)種“無能(néng)為( ☆©wèi)力”的(de)無奈。

  從(cóng)表面看(kàn),這(zhè)種σσ高(gāo)額“買路(lù)錢(qián)”的(de)背後,是(shì)行(xíng)業(yè)缺≈™ 乏自(zì)身(shēn)的(de)銷售能(néng)力,缺乏↓∏自(zì)己的(de)渠道(dào),因此,不(bù)得(de)不(bù)仰仗于人(rén★"♥→),受制(zhì)于人(rén)。同時(shí),行(xíng)業(yè)內(nèi)部的(₹♥de)惡性競争,相(xiàng)互厮殺,也(yě)是(shì)導緻這(zhè)種結果的(de♦♦)重要(yào)原因和(hé)推手。但(dàn)從(cóng)根本看(kàn),​¶​在當今互聯網社會(huì),保險公司,尤其是(&™shì)中小(xiǎo)保險公司是(shì)難以與那(nà)些(xiē)大(dà)型的(de)互聯♣↕≈ 網門(mén)戶抗衡的(de)。因此,需要(yào)從(↑ γ€cóng)社會(huì)公平的(de)角度看(kàn)問(wèn)題。中國(gu₩ ó)的(de)商業(yè)倫理(lǐ)講的(de)是(sh∞λì):君子(zǐ)愛(ài)财,取之有(yǒu)道(dào)≥&∏φ。而互聯網門(mén)戶,依仗自(zì)身(shēn)的(de)市(shì)場(chǎ &≥$ng)勢力,漫天要(yào)價,強取豪奪,嚴重侵害了(le)社會(huì)公共利益,要(☆§<♠yào)知(zhī)道(dào),這(zhè)種高(gāo)額®¶ ©的(de)“買路(lù)錢(qián)”*終還(hái♦ Ω)是(shì)要(yào)由消費(fèi)者和(hé)社會(huì)買單的(de),顯然,這(✘α εzhè)種“商業(yè)模式”與“道(dà♣©↔o)”是(shì)漸行(xíng)漸遠(yuǎn),乃至背道(dà∏→o)而馳,應當引起全社會(huì)的(de)高(gāo)度關注。值得(de)注≈♥•意的(de)是(shì)這(zhè)種互聯網“商業(y£φè)模式”已經導緻了(le)線上(shàng)成本甚至高(gāo)于線下(xià) ↕×δ成本的(de)問(wèn)題,這(zhè)無疑是(shì)飲鸩止渴,乃至是(shì)自(zì)≥'€>掘墳墓。

  在中國(guó),做(zuò)保險本不(bù)容易,在互聯網上(shàn♠✔δg)做(zuò)保險就(jiù)更不(bù)α£λ∏容易。但(dàn)正是(shì)因為(wèi)“不(bù)容易”,就(jiùφ•&)要(yào)更加珍惜,更加誠信。近(jìn↕←>)來(lái),有(yǒu)些(xiē)“網紅(hóng)”的(de)健康保險産品,采用(yòng∑£♠)了(le)“全免”的(de)承保政策,引發“爆款”σ☆效應。但(dàn)問(wèn)題的(de)關鍵是(sh∏&ì)“寬進”能(néng)否“寬出”?如(rú)果一(yī)開(kāi)始就(jiù)>‌≈§預謀著(zhe)“寬進嚴出”,那(nà)麽,誠信何在,天理(lǐ)何在¥✘。古人(rén)說(shuō):己所不(bù)欲勿施于人(rén),況且誰都&★(dōu)不(bù)傻,如(rú)果非要(yào)這(zhè)麽做(zuò),終究要×≠↓×(yào)付出更大(dà)的(de)代價。此外(wài),一(yī)些(xi>£≤ē)“大(dà)手筆(bǐ)”的(de)優惠措施,是(shì)否有(yǒu)科(kē)學↓✘×≥,特别是(shì)數(shù)據依據,能(néng)否守約,±>能(néng)否持久,也(yě)值得(de)質疑。一(yε®≥'ī)時(shí)吸引眼球固然刺激,但(dàn)日(rì)子(zǐ)還(hái)需要(yào)慢↔♣‍(màn)慢(màn)過,保險更是(shì)這(zhè)樣。也(yě)許有(yǒu)人(rén±♦)說(shuō),虧錢(qián)沒關系,反正燒的(de)是(shì←§₩•)VC的(de)錢(qián),但(dàn)VC的(de)錢(qián)總有(yǒu)燒完λ↕‍✔的(de)一(yī)天,重要(yào)的(de)是(s¥‍>∏hì)“沒有(yǒu)了(le)錢(qián)燒”的(de)日(rì)子(zǐ)怎麽過。更Ω↔₹讓人(rén)擔憂的(de)是(shì),一(↕♥₹yī)陣風(fēng)過後,VC還(hái)是(shì)昨天的✔∑(de)VC,你(nǐ)已不(bù)是(shì)從(♥εγ✘cóng)前的(de)你(nǐ)。

  互聯網保險是(shì)需要(yào)發展,但(dàn)更需要(yào)理(lǐ)性發展;‌♦₽業(yè)務需要(yào)增長(cháng),但(dà↔δn)必須是(shì)有(yǒu)益增長(cháng),而不 ¥×♥(bù)是(shì)有(yǒu)害增長(chán₩÷εβg)。任何時(shí)代,總有(yǒu)些(xiē)‍∑π人(rén)比較任性,但(dàn)這(zhè)種“任性”的(de)後果往往是(sh£☆∏ì)要(yào)社會(huì)和(hé)行(xíng)業(yè)買單的∑♥(de),因此,發展互聯網保險,作(zu↕♣✔ò)為(wèi)個(gè)體(tǐ),切莫“不(b "ù)管不(bù)顧”,作(zuò)為(wèi)行(xíng)業(yè),對(duì≥™ δ)少(shǎo)數(shù)人(rén)的(de)‍®‌“不(bù)管不(bù)顧”,不(bù)能(néng)視(shì)而不(bù)見&±←≥(jiàn),聽(tīng)之任之。

  縱觀人(rén)類社會(huì)發展的(de)曆史,所γ¶®ε有(yǒu)的(de)進化(huà),包括了(le)技(jì)術(∑®±←shù)、制(zhì)度和(hé)社會(huì),乃至大(dà)千世界,均遵♥₩∑∏循著(zhe)遺傳、突變和(hé)選擇的(de)規律,互₽←γ聯網保險也(yě)不(bù)可(kě)能(néng)<​例外(wài)。發展互聯網保險,首先,是(shì)把握根本∞ ,即回答(dá)并堅守保險的(de)根本,解決好(hǎo)“→β₩傳承”問(wèn)題。其次,是(shì)善于創新,即實現(✔δ↔xiàn)創新發展,特别是(shì)本質創新,解決好(h'♠ǎo)“突變”問(wèn)題。第三,是(shì)不(bù)忘初心,即要(yào)→α∏做(zuò)到(dào)萬變不(bù)離(lí)其宗,取舍自(zì$♣™β)如(rú),這(zhè)種“選擇”的(de★'≤)本質是(shì)道(dào)法自(zì)然。

  互聯網保險是(shì)個(gè)新概念,發展互聯網保險更需要(yào)傳統文(wén)化(Ω"huà)的(de)滋養。中國(guó)古人(rén)說♥∑©<(shuō):人(rén)能(néng)弘道(dào),非到(dào)弘人(rén☆§₩)。在互聯網保險的(de)發展過程中,“主語”是(shì)人(rén),包括企∏≥業(yè)、行(xíng)業(yè)和(hé)客戶,即是(shì)靠人(rén×®₽)去(qù)弘互聯網的(de)道(dào)≈&‌,而不(bù)是(shì)由互聯網來(lái)弘人(rén),這(zhè)個(gè)“π ≤道(dào)”就(jiù)是(shì)利用(yòng)互聯網 ✔技(jì)術(shù)更好(hǎo)地(dì)為(wèi)客戶提↑™≈供服務,為(wèi)社會(huì)創造福祉,為(wèi)行(xíλ>ng)業(yè)謀求發展。就(jiù)互聯網保險而言,什(shén)麽是(shì)自(zì)己的(±‍de)“道(dào)”,真的(de)要(yào)好(hǎo✔∞÷)好(hǎo)想想,切莫辜負時(shí)代。

  要(yào)“弘道(dào)”,關鍵是(shì)要(yào)“✘≠厚德”,“厚德”方可(kě)“載物(wù)”。要(yào)“弘道(dào)”,更需要(yào)“行$£(xíng)深”,“行(xíng)深”才能(néng)“緻遠(yuǎn)”。面向未來(lái)₩λ,中國(guó)保險業(yè),也(yě)包括互聯網保₹¶&險可(kě)謂是(shì):任重道(dà♣↕‍o)遠(yuǎn)。走好(hǎo)未來(lái)的(d≥αe)路(lù),遠(yuǎn)見(jiàn)卓識,開(kāi)疆拓土(tǔ)固然重要(yào€ £),但(dàn)集體(tǐ)共識,克己複禮,厚德載物(wù),道(dào)行(xíng)天下(x δΩ≥ià)更重要(yào)。

保險學者,中國(guó)人(rén)保财險執行(xíng)副總裁

轉自(zì)新浪财經

暫無評論!
我要(yào)評論 隻有(yǒu)購(gòu)買過該商品的(de)用(y↑ 'òng)戶才能(néng)評論。

From :businessinsuranceU.S. comme♦↕≥→rcial property/casualty rates rose 5% on average ←δ↑in the fourth quarter↕€↑✘ of 2019, up from 4% in the third quarβ≤ter, reflecting insurers’ intent to continue t<∏'o increase prices across most lines, online insur₩≠ance exchange MarketScout Corp.∞∏ said Monday.“Auto rate i'‌ncreases have been up all year∑≤≠ long; however D&O (directors & of®<✔ficers) and professional rate increase≤•✔s have spiked significantly in the fourth quarte∑≥♥r,” Richard Kerr, CEO o↓✔♠f MarketScout Corp. sai→≤¶d in a statement.Insurers are care∞←fully analyzing their prope§&₩rty exposures using catastrophe modeli÷"©ng tools, he said. “We expect many♣ ™← of the major property caδ®•tastrophe insurers to curtail their 2020 writin↕∑£₩gs in California brush and East and Gulf Coast wiΩ₹∏nd areas. Naturally, t★​π₹his will result in highe∞↑₹∞r rates to insureds,” Mr. Kerr s¶§aid.D&O liability rates increa♥Ω‍×sed by 8.25%, while commercial aγ××uto increased 8% in t÷✔he quarter, and professio✘↔>$nal liability rates were up 6%, and umbrella/eπ÷φ∑xcess rates were up 5.5%, according €‍₹to MarketScout.Commercial÷↔ property rates increased 5.25% in the quarter‌↓≈, and business interruption rates we£♠®re up 5%, while all other lines showed smδ aller increases, except for workers compensat≤®σion, where rates fell 1%, MarketScout •₹said.By industry class, transport✔φ₩¶ation and habitational♥♦ $ saw the highest average <∞εrate increases at 9% and 8.25%Ω£™ respectively, MarketScout said.La€≠εΩrge accounts – those wΩ∞βith $250,001 to $1 milliε↑β™on in premium – saw a rat​γ©∞e hike of 5.5% in the fourth quarter, as did j☆≈∑>umbo accounts, which have mo$<€₩re than $1 million in ★₩ premium. Small accounts – those with up to§↓∏ $25,000 in premium  ★" – were up 5%, while medium©₹₹  accounts – those with $25,001 toφ¥≤₹ $250,000 in premium – were up 4.5%.T₩®≤₹he “steady trend” of upward rates re λflects insurers’ plans to continue incr ♣★easing prices across all lin ​↓es except for workers compensation, MarketScout s≠€aid.Organizer:China Insurance Digital & AI D&✔>®evelopment 2020Web:http://en.zenseeg ¶∑σroup.com/p/560573/Contact ✔₹φ:Ann 021-65650305

From :insurancejournalIt was ¶↓a relatively quiet yea₹≈£'r for the Southeast in te£↔•rms of major catastrophπ‍es compared with 2018'®β when Hurricane’s Michael and Florence caused maj‍¶'or damage in the regi¥δon. This year, Hurricane Dorian ✘♣☆sideswiped the Southeast coast and maε"×de landfall on the Oute↑≤β↓r Banks of North Carolina but most of the area≈$ was spared. Still,  >;Aon said economic damage in theβ← ± U.S. and Canada was poiσσsed to approach a combined $1.5 billion.Flo‌¶rida spent the year recoverin★‍g from Hurricane Michael, whi♦♥¥ch was upgraded to a Category 5 storm by ≈•φNOAA in April. Florida officials ha→∞ve repeatedly called on ≤ >εthe insurance industry to speed up t™"☆he recovery process, with nearly 12% of clai←£γ✘ms still open a year after the st✔β←orm hit.Organizer:Chi€Ω>na Insurance Digital & AI Development≈≥ 2020Web:http://en.zenseegroup.com/p/560573 π/Contact:Ann 021-65650305

From:businessinsuranceeinsurance renewal♠"≥s at Jan. 1, 2020, main™×♠"ly saw single-digit increases, with soφαπ"me exceptions, according to reports by reinsuraβπnce brokers released Thursday.W≥™←illis Re, the reinsurance brokerage☆©σ× of Willis Towers Watson PL<®C, and Guy Carpenter &aπβ©mp; Co. LLC, a unit of Marsh & Mc∞≠¶×Lennan Cos. Inc. both reported ↑∑that year-end reinsuranc₽☆‌✔e renewals varied by account and☆→§  region, but the retrocessiona←£l reinsurance was under pressure.Rates←↕↔® on line for property catastrophe  ∏©reinsurance programs §™α‍remained stable and property per ri↑φ sk pricing was driven by individual prograα÷m performance, the Willis report said.Although♠₹ some Lloyd’s of London syndicate✔λφs took firm positions on rate increas♣✘"es and the London market authααλ£orized capacity decreased, that capactiy was rep≠×☆σlaced by new capital and a strong ≤₽'£supply from other markets, Willis Re said.U.S. lo ₹ss-free accounts renewed at flat to up 1™↔••0% while those with losses sa €↑w increases of 10% to 50%, the Willis"≈ Re report said, whi€≈©ch was among the largest increases. Pr÷↑♣operty catastrophe accounts without losses rene₽≈wed at flat to up 5%, w↕σ♣©hile loss hit accounts were up 10% to 20%, Wil™ λlis Re said.According to the Guy  ←•✔Carpenter report, the brokerage’s globa☆>★l property catastrophe rate on line ind§ε £ex rose 5% in 2019.According to th​✘★"e Willis Re report, ot♣ε¥her large increases were seen in Central and East×€§ern Europe, where property programs with ↕​✔losses saw increases of 5% to 20% σ, and Canada, where such accounts r ‌♥enewed up 10% to 40%.Most other regions ✘≤and countries saw prop☆✘∑erty increases in the single or low double dig  its, the report said.T÷‌he Jan. 1 renewals saw some “difficul≈♥≤t” negotiations, accor≈>→&ding to a letter in th←✔'e report from James Kent, global CEO, Willis Re.T•©he Guy Carpenter repor☆ φt said the reinsuranc™↓ ♦e market was “asymmetrical,” adding “this is cer Ω↑tainly not a one-size-fits-all market” and ¶®♣<while overall capacit★σ¶​y remained adequate, “alloca​♦ted capacity tightened n  ↓otably in stressed classes.”×​Dedicated reinsurance capital rose 2% in 20π↑'β19 and the year saw appro ‍♥☆ximately $60 billion '€in global insured catas&★trophe losses, according to Guy Carp≈♥♦πenter, which was significantly lower than 2017 an↑♥≤Ωd 2018.Alternative capital, however, cont¶¶ §racted by approximately 7% percent “as invest♥≤ors were more cautio‌'' us with new investments≥♥§∞ after assessing market dynamics and pric¥φ↓​ing adequacy,” Guy Carpenter said.The retr®​ocession market “was challenged … by trappe  d capital, a lack of new capital and continued re©♦÷★demptions from third-party capital providers,” φ↑a statement issued with the Guy Carpenteγγ✔δr report said.However, significanα¶§t retrocession providers r₩≈∏£eturned to the market in the past two weeksε©•, Willis Re said.Organizer:China Insurance Di​ π∞gital & AI Development 2020Web:→↔http://en.zenseegroup.¶γ≤&com/p/560573/Contact:Ann 021-π ₽65650305

Major information technology compan✘÷ies in India are running the risk of ter★>÷∞mination of their $1 billion contr© acts following Boeing Co.’s decision to ha¥÷lt the production of Ωδπεits 737 Max jets, MoneyControl rep®"orted citing the Business Standard. Co≠">¶mpanies like Tata Consultancy Services ↑≥↓₩Ltd., Infosys Ltd., HCL Technologies Ltd., Cyi♠≈ent Ltd. and L&T Technology Servic&×βes Ltd. have outsourcing contracts with Boei↕∞ng or its suppliers anγ ®♥d Boeing’s jet crisis is expected to Ω₽ε'affect these IT companies in the♠∏ short run.From:busineσπ↔ssinsuranceOrganizer:Cπ$¶hina Insurance Digital & AI Development 2↓€020Web:http://en.zenseegroup.com/p/560573/Coλ≤♠ntact:Ann 021-65650305

France-based eyewear •± ∞maker Essilor Internat→₹£✔ional S.A. has discovered fraudulent activitie"☆s at one of its factories in Thailand that could®≠ ≤ cause €190 million ($213 million) in‍✘ financial losses to the↔↕★ company, The Irish Times r®<Ω↑eported citing Reuters. The company has filed $&λαcomplaints in Thailand and has f★↑ired all the involved employees. It hopes to re♥≠∏cover the losses from frozen bank£≥  accounts, insurance and lawsuits.Organizer:Chin$₽a Insurance Digital & AI Developme♠÷nt 2020Web:http://en.zeε&nseegroup.com/p/560573/Co"♥ntact:Ann 021-65650305

About Us
Contact Us
Zensee_Daystar online €π™